↓ Skip to main content

Response to “Twitter-Based Journal Clubs: Some Additional Facts and Clarifications”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to “Twitter-Based Journal Clubs: Some Additional Facts and Clarifications”
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, January 2015
DOI 10.2196/jmir.4786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlon Perera, Perera, Marlon, Roberts, Matthew, Lawrentschuk, Nathan, Bolton, Damien, Matthew Roberts, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Damien Bolton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#919,101
of 12,210,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,025
of 2,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,710
of 244,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#38
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,210,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.