Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 43,983)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
603 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1423041112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cody E. Hinchliff, Stephen A. Smith, James F. Allman, J. Gordon Burleigh, Ruchi Chaudhary, Lyndon M. Coghill, Keith A. Crandall, Jiabin Deng, Bryan T. Drew, Romina Gazis, Karl Gude, David S. Hibbett, Laura A. Katz, H. Dail Laughinghouse IV, Emily Jane McTavish, Peter E. Midford, Christopher L. Owen, Richard H. Ree, Jonathan A. Rees, Douglas E. Soltis, Tiffani Williams, Karen A. Cranston, H. Dail Laughinghouse

Abstract

Reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships that unite all lineages (the tree of life) is a grand challenge. The paucity of homologous character data across disparately related lineages currently renders direct phylogenetic inference untenable. To reconstruct a comprehensive tree of life, we therefore synthesized published phylogenies, together with taxonomic classifications for taxa never incorporated into a phylogeny. We present a draft tree containing 2.3 million tips-the Open Tree of Life. Realization of this tree required the assembly of two additional community resources: (i) a comprehensive global reference taxonomy and (ii) a database of published phylogenetic trees mapped to this taxonomy. Our open source framework facilitates community comment and contribution, enabling the tree to be continuously updated when new phylogenetic and taxonomic data become digitally available. Although data coverage and phylogenetic conflict across the Open Tree of Life illuminate gaps in both the underlying data available for phylogenetic reconstruction and the publication of trees as digital objects, the tree provides a compelling starting point for community contribution. This comprehensive tree will fuel fundamental research on the nature of biological diversity, ultimately providing up-to-date phylogenies for downstream applications in comparative biology, ecology, conservation biology, climate change, agriculture, and genomics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 825 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 33 5%
France 12 2%
Brazil 12 2%
Germany 11 2%
United Kingdom 8 1%
Mexico 7 1%
Canada 5 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Other 52 9%
Unknown 454 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 148 25%
Researcher 138 23%
Student > Master 92 15%
Student > Bachelor 59 10%
Professor 44 7%
Other 122 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 448 74%
Environmental Science 34 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 5%
Computer Science 24 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 3%
Other 50 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,003
of 7,434,755 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#39
of 43,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48
of 231,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2
of 956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,434,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.