| Title |
Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1423041112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cody E Hinchliff, Stephen A Smith, James F Allman, J Gordon Burleigh, Ruchi Chaudhary, Lyndon M Coghill, Keith A Crandall, Jiabin Deng, Bryan T Drew, Romina Gazis, Karl Gude, David S Hibbett, Laura A Katz, H Dail Laughinghouse, Emily Jane McTavish, Peter E Midford, Christopher L Owen, Richard H Ree, Jonathan A Rees, Douglas E Soltis, Tiffani Williams, Karen A Cranston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 824 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 187 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 69 | 8% |
| Japan | 26 | 3% |
| Canada | 23 | 3% |
| Spain | 20 | 2% |
| Australia | 17 | 2% |
| Germany | 16 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 11 | 1% |
| Brazil | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 125 | 15% |
| Unknown | 320 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 573 | 70% |
| Scientists | 217 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 2% |
| France | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Mexico | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Sweden | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 47 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1201 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 272 | 20% |
| Researcher | 267 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 172 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 9% |
| Professor | 94 | 7% |
| Other | 246 | 19% |
| Unknown | 159 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 683 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 143 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 97 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 41 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 3% |
| Other | 121 | 9% |
| Unknown | 207 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#13,611
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#427
of 103,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107
of 285,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8
of 890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.