You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pediatric functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging: tactics for encouraging task compliance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-7-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael W Schlund, Michael F Cataldo, Greg J Siegle, Cecile D Ladouceur, Jennifer S Silk, Erika E Forbes, Ashley McFarland, Satish Iyengar, Ronald E Dahl, Neal D Ryan |
| Abstract |
Neuroimaging technology has afforded advances in our understanding of normal and pathological brain function and development in children and adolescents. However, noncompliance involving the inability to remain in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner to complete tasks is one common and significant problem. Task noncompliance is an especially significant problem in pediatric functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research because increases in noncompliance produces a greater risk that a study sample will not be representative of the study population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#256
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,947
of 121,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.