You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotype of p53 wild-type epitope-specific T cells in the circulation of patients with head and neck cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-29067-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas E. Albers, Xu Qian, Andreas M. Kaufmann, Daphne Mytilineos, Robert L. Ferris, Thomas K. Hoffmann, Albert B. DeLeo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,421,028
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#68,504
of 124,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,231
of 326,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,981
of 3,554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.