↓ Skip to main content

Establishing conservation baselines with dynamic distribution models for bat populations facing imminent decline

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing conservation baselines with dynamic distribution models for bat populations facing imminent decline
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, September 2015
DOI 10.1111/ddi.12372
Authors

Thomas J. Rodhouse, Patricia C. Ormsbee, Kathryn M. Irvine, Lee A. Vierling, Joseph M. Szewczak, Kerri T. Vierling

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Other 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 54%
Environmental Science 25 36%
Unspecified 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,391,145
of 12,354,747 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#306
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,445
of 252,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#22
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,354,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.