↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005215.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oringanje, Chioma, Meremikwu, Martin M, Eko, Hokehe, Esu, Ekpereonne, Meremikwu, Anne, Ehiri, John E

Abstract

Unintended pregnancy among adolescents represent an important public health challenge in developed and developing countries. Numerous prevention strategies such as health education, skills-building and improving accessibility to contraceptives have been employed by countries across the world, in an effort to address this problem. However, there is uncertainty regarding the effects of these intervention, and hence the need to review their evidence-base

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 35%
Social Sciences 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,901,663
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,155
of 13,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,778
of 101,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.