↓ Skip to main content

Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001452.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vibhuti S Shah, Arne Ohlsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 15 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,862,393
of 15,606,530 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,610
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,792
of 250,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#215
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.