↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of vitamin D deficiency in children following cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of vitamin D deficiency in children following cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0922-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Dayre McNally, Katie O’Hearn, Margaret L. Lawson, Gyaandeo Maharajh, Pavel Geier, Hope Weiler, Stephanie Redpath, Lauralyn McIntyre, Dean Fergusson, Kusum Menon

Abstract

Vitamin D is a pleiotropic hormone important for the recovery of organ systems after critical illness. Recent observational studies have suggested that three out of every four children are vitamin D deficient following cardiac surgery, with inadequate preoperative intake and surgical losses playing important contributory roles. Observed associations between postoperative levels, cardiovascular dysfunction and clinical course suggest that perioperative optimization of vitamin D status could improve outcome. With this two-arm, parallel, double blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we aim to compare immediate postoperative vitamin D status in children requiring cardiopulmonary bypass for congenital heart disease who receive preoperative daily high dose vitamin D supplementation (high-dose arm) with those who receive usual intake (low-dose arm). Eligibility requirements include age (>36 weeks, <18 years) and a congenital heart defect requiring cardiopulmonary bypass surgical correction. Enrollment of 62 participants will take place at a single Canadian tertiary care center over a period of 2 years. Children randomized to the high-dose group will receive age-based dosing that was informed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) daily tolerable upper intake level (<1 year old = 1,600 IU/day, >1 year old = 2,400 IU/day). Children in the low-dose arm will receive usual care based on IOM recommendations (<1 year old = 400 IU, >1 year old = 600 IU). The primary outcome measure is immediate postoperative vitamin D status, using blood 25(OH)D. Maintaining adequate postoperative vitamin D levels following surgery could represent an effective therapy to speed recovery following CHD surgery. The proposed research project will determine whether preoperative supplementation with a dosing regimen based on the IOM recommended daily upper tolerable intake will prevent postoperative vitamin-D deficiency in the majority of children. The results will then be used to inform the design of a large international RCT exploring whether preoperative optimization of vitamin D status might improve short and long-term outcomes in this vulnerable population. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier - NCT01838447 Date of registration: 11 April 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 49 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 52 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,149,214
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#19
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,455
of 281,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#51
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.