↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis and structure of solution-stable one-dimensional palladium wires

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemistry, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthesis and structure of solution-stable one-dimensional palladium wires
Published in
Nature Chemistry, November 2011
DOI 10.1038/nchem.1197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael G. Campbell, David C. Powers, Jean Raynaud, Michael J. Graham, Ping Xie, Eunsung Lee, Tobias Ritter

Abstract

One-dimensional metal wires are valuable materials because of their optical and electronic anisotropy, and they have potential utility in devices such as photovoltaic cells and molecular sensors. However, despite more than a century of research, only a few examples exist of well-defined one-dimensional (1D) metal wires that allow for the rational variation of conductivity. Herein we describe the first examples of 1D molecular wires supported by Pd-Pd bonds, the thin-film conductive properties of which can be altered by controlled molecular changes. Wires based on Pd(III) give semiconducting films with a modifiable bandgap, whereas wires based on Pd(2.5) give films that display metallic conductivity above 200 K: a metallic state has not been reported previously for any polymer composed of 1D metal wires. The wires are infinite in the solid state and maintain 1D structures in solution with lengths of up to 750 nm. Solution stability enables thin film coating, a requisite for device fabrication using molecular wires.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 37%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 63 78%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,664,859
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemistry
#2,136
of 2,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,742
of 141,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemistry
#26
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.