↓ Skip to main content

Inhibitory effect of aqueous dandelion extract on HIV-1 replication and reverse transcriptase activity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibitory effect of aqueous dandelion extract on HIV-1 replication and reverse transcriptase activity
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-11-112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huamin Han, Wen He, Wei Wang, Bin Gao

Abstract

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), which is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), is an immunosuppressive disease that results in life-threatening opportunistic infections. The general problems in current therapy include the constant emergence of drug-resistant HIV strains, adverse side effects and the unavailability of treatments in developing countries. Natural products from herbs with the abilities to inhibit HIV-1 life cycle at different stages, have served as excellent sources of new anti-HIV-1 drugs. In this study, we aimed to investigate the anti-HIV-1 activity of aqueous dandelion extract.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,538,749
of 25,335,657 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#255
of 3,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,869
of 147,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#7
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,335,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.