↓ Skip to main content

A data-independent acquisition workflow for qualitative screening of new psychoactive substances in biological samples

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A data-independent acquisition workflow for qualitative screening of new psychoactive substances in biological samples
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-9036-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliet Kinyua, Noelia Negreira, María Ibáñez, Lubertus Bijlsma, Félix Hernández, Adrian Covaci, Alexander L. N. van Nuijs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 29%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 20 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,604,528
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,802
of 9,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,423
of 286,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#71
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.