↓ Skip to main content

Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2015

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2015'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 CCAnr: A Configuration Checking Based Local Search Solver for Non-random Satisfiability
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 PBLib – A Library for Encoding Pseudo-Boolean Constraints into CNF
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Speeding up MUS Extraction with Preprocessing and Chunking
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Improved Algorithms for Sparse MAX-SAT and MAX-k-CSP
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Laissez-Faire Caching for Parallel #SAT Solving
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 SATGraf : Visualizing the Evolution of SAT Formula Structure in Solvers
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Hints Revealed
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Mining Backbone Literals in Incremental SAT
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Constructing SAT Filters with a Quantum Annealer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 $$\#\exists $$ SAT: Projected Model Counting
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing -- SAT 2015
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 HordeSat: A Massively Parallel Portfolio SAT Solver
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Preprocessing for DQBF
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Incrementally Computing Minimal Unsatisfiable Cores of QBFs via a Clause Group Solver API
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 On Compiling CNFs into Structured Deterministic DNNFs
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 SpySMAC : Automated Configuration and Performance Analysis of SAT Solvers
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Community Structure Inspired Algorithms for SAT and #SAT
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Using Community Structure to Detect Relevant Learnt Clauses
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Recognition of Nested Gates in CNF Formulas
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Exploiting Resolution-Based Representations for MaxSAT Solving
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing -- SAT 2015
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Volt: A Lazy Grounding Framework for Solving Very Large MaxSAT Instances
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing -- SAT 2015
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 QELL: QBF Reasoning with Extended Clause Learning and Levelized SAT Solving
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 SMT-RAT : An Open Source C++ Toolbox for Strategic and Parallel SMT Solving
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Search-Space Partitioning for Parallelizing SMT Solvers
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 A New Approach to Partial MUS Enumeration
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Evaluating CDCL Variable Scoring Schemes
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing -- SAT 2015
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2015
Published by
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24318-4
ISBNs
978-3-31-924317-7, 978-3-31-924318-4
Authors

Marijn Heule, Sean Weaver

Editors

Heule, Marijn, Weaver, Sean

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 31%
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 38%
Environmental Science 12 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 3 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#9,153,768
of 14,573,111 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,101
of 7,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,901
of 249,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#84
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,573,111 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,467 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.