↓ Skip to main content

Ongoing burden of disease and mortality from HIV/CMV coinfection in Africa in the antiretroviral therapy era

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ongoing burden of disease and mortality from HIV/CMV coinfection in Africa in the antiretroviral therapy era
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Adland, Paul Klenerman, Philip Goulder, Philippa C. Matthews

Abstract

Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a well-recognized pathogen in the context of HIV infection, but since the roll out of ART, clinical and scientific interest in the problem of HIV/CMV coinfection has diminished. However, CMV remains a significant cofactor in HIV disease, with an influence on HIV acquisition, disease progression, morbidity, and mortality. Disease manifestations may be a result of direct interplay between the two viruses, or may arise as a secondary consequence of immune dysregulation and systemic inflammation. The problem is most relevant when the rates of coinfection are high, most notably in sub-Saharan Africa, and in children at risk of acquiring both infections early in life. Understanding the interplay between these viruses and developing strategies to diagnose, treat and prevent CMV should be a priority.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 21%
Student > Master 31 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 24 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,757,501
of 6,265,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,119
of 4,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,404
of 191,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#180
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,265,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.