↓ Skip to main content

Suppression of atom motion and metal deposition in mixed ionic electronic conductors

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suppression of atom motion and metal deposition in mixed ionic electronic conductors
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05248-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pengfei Qiu, Matthias T. Agne, Yongying Liu, Yaqin Zhu, Hongyi Chen, Tao Mao, Jiong Yang, Wenqing Zhang, Sossina M. Haile, Wolfgang G. Zeier, Jürgen Janek, Ctirad Uher, Xun Shi, Lidong Chen, G. Jeffrey Snyder

Abstract

Many superionic mixed ionic-electronic conductors with a liquid-like sublattice have been identified as high efficiency thermoelectric materials, but their applications are limited due to the possibility of decomposition when subjected to high electronic currents and large temperature gradients. Here, through systematically investigating electromigration in copper sulfide/selenide thermoelectric materials, we reveal the mechanism for atom migration and deposition based on a critical chemical potential difference. Then, a strategy for stable use is proposed: constructing a series of electronically conducting, but ion-blocking barriers to reset the chemical potential of such conductors to keep it below the threshold for decomposition, even if it is used with high electric currents and/or large temperature differences. This strategy not only opens the possibility of using such conductors in thermoelectric applications, but may also provide approaches to engineer perovskite photovoltaic materials and the experimental methods may be applicable to understanding dendrite growth in lithium ion batteries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 40 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 39 31%
Chemistry 20 16%
Physics and Astronomy 7 6%
Chemical Engineering 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,132,366
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#32,593
of 57,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,563
of 341,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#795
of 1,324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.