↓ Skip to main content

The functions of nonsuicidal self-injury: converging evidence for a two-factor structure

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 672)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The functions of nonsuicidal self-injury: converging evidence for a two-factor structure
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13034-015-0073-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. David Klonsky, Catherine R. Glenn, Denise M. Styer, Thomas M. Olino, Jason J. Washburn

Abstract

Research has identified more than a dozen functions of non-suicidal self-injury (NSI), but the conceptual and empirical overlap among these functions remains unclear. The present study examined the structure of NSI functions in two large samples of patients receiving acute-care treatment for NSI. Two different measures of NSI functions were utilized to maximize generalizability of findings: one sample (n = 946) was administered the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS; Klonsky and Glenn in J Psychopathol Behav Assess 31:215-219, 2009), and a second sample (n = 211) was administered the Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation (FASM; Lloyd et al. in Self-mutilation in a community sample of adolescents: descriptive characteristics and provisional prevalence rates. Poster session at the annual meeting of the Society for Behavioral Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 1997). Exploratory factor analyses revealed that both measures exhibited a robust two-factor structure: one factor represented Intrapersonal functions, such as affect regulation and anti-dissociation, and a second factor represented Social functions, such as interpersonal influence and peer bonding. In support of the two-factor structure's construct validity, the factors exhibited a pattern of correlations with indicators of NSI severity that was consistent with past research and theory. Findings have important implications for theory, research, and treatment. In particular, the two-factor framework should guide clinical assessment, as well as future research on the implications of NSI functions for course, prognosis, treatment, and suicide risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 251 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 15%
Student > Master 37 15%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 65 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 126 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 11%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 67 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2022.
All research outputs
#426,371
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#15
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,375
of 275,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.