You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris)
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10344-018-1210-1 |
Authors |
Samanta Waxman, Marcela Orozco, Hernán Argibay, Casilda Rodriguez, Pablo Otero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 30% |
Lecturer | 2 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 60% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#771
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,654
of 330,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.