↓ Skip to main content

Hydrated silicate minerals on Mars observed by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter CRISM instrument

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
523 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrated silicate minerals on Mars observed by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter CRISM instrument
Published in
Nature, July 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature07097
Pubmed ID
Authors

John F. Mustard, S. L. Murchie, S. M. Pelkey, B. L. Ehlmann, R. E. Milliken, J. A. Grant, J.-P. Bibring, F. Poulet, J. Bishop, E. Noe Dobrea, L. Roach, F. Seelos, R. E. Arvidson, S. Wiseman, R. Green, C. Hash, D. Humm, E. Malaret, J. A. McGovern, K. Seelos, T. Clancy, R. Clark, D. D. Marais, N. Izenberg, A. Knudson, Y. Langevin, T. Martin, P. McGuire, R. Morris, M. Robinson, T. Roush, M. Smith, G. Swayze, H. Taylor, T. Titus, M. Wolff

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 333 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 27%
Researcher 79 22%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Professor 20 6%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 35 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 190 54%
Physics and Astronomy 45 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Chemistry 15 4%
Engineering 14 4%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 49 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,722,260
of 18,374,253 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#49,205
of 81,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,148
of 258,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#922
of 1,030 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,374,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,030 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.