↓ Skip to main content

Bundling and stacking in bio-sequestration schemes: Opportunities and risks identified by Australian stakeholders

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystem Services, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bundling and stacking in bio-sequestration schemes: Opportunities and risks identified by Australian stakeholders
Published in
Ecosystem Services, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.001
Authors

Nooshin Torabi, Sarah A. Bekessy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#12,936,730
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#680
of 987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,906
of 274,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.