↓ Skip to main content

Bundling and stacking in bio-sequestration schemes: Opportunities and risks identified by Australian stakeholders

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystem Services, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bundling and stacking in bio-sequestration schemes: Opportunities and risks identified by Australian stakeholders
Published in
Ecosystem Services, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.001
Authors

Nooshin Torabi, Sarah A. Bekessy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,522,998
of 12,553,775 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#311
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,390
of 246,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,553,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.