Title |
Social Media and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)—Focus on Twitter and the Development of a Disease-specific Community: #MPNSM
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11899-015-0287-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Naveen Pemmaraju, Vikas Gupta, Ruben Mesa, Michael A. Thompson |
Abstract |
The advent of social media has led to the ability for individuals all over the world to communicate with each other, in real time, about mutual topics of interest in an unprecedented manner. Recently, the use of social media has increased among people interested in healthcare and medical research, particularly in the field of hematology and oncology, a field which frequently experiences rapid shifts of information and novel, practice-changing discoveries. Among the many social media platforms available to cancer patients and providers, one platform in particular, Twitter, has become the focus for the creation of disease-specific communities, especially for those interested in, affected by, or those who perform research in the fields of rare cancers, which historically have had a dearth of reliable information available. This article will focus on the initiation and progress of one such Twitter hematology/oncology community, #mpnsm, which was originally created for the purpose of serving as a venue for improving the interaction among patients, providers, researchers, and organizations with interest in the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and to further the availability of reliable up-to-date analysis; relevant expert commentary; and readily usable information for patients, providers, and other groups interested in this field. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 35 | 42% |
Canada | 4 | 5% |
Spain | 4 | 5% |
Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
India | 2 | 2% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Mauritius | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 28 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 52 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 18% |
Scientists | 10 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 18% |
Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |