You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of primary ciliary dyskinesia: PCD foundation consensus recommendations based on state of the art review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Pulmonology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ppul.23304 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam J. Shapiro, Maimoona A. Zariwala, Thomas Ferkol, Stephanie D. Davis, Scott D. Sagel, Sharon D. Dell, Margaret Rosenfeld, Kenneth N. Olivier, Carlos Milla, Sam J. Daniel, Adam J. Kimple, Michele Manion, Michael R. Knowles, Margaret W. Leigh |
| Abstract |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a genetically heterogeneous, rare lung disease resulting in chronic oto-sino-pulmonary disease in both children and adults. Many physicians incorrectly diagnose PCD or eliminate PCD from their differential diagnosis due to inexperience with diagnostic testing methods. Thus far, all therapies used for PCD are unproven through large clinical trials. This review article outlines consensus recommendations from PCD physicians in North America who have been engaged in a PCD centered research consortium for the last 10 years. These recommendations have been adopted by the governing board of the PCD Foundation to provide guidance for PCD clinical centers for diagnostic testing, monitoring, and appropriate short and long-term therapeutics in PCD patients. Pediatr Pulmonol. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 321 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
| Researcher | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 69 | 21% |
| Unknown | 92 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 104 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,612,925
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Pulmonology
#4
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,910
of 287,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Pulmonology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.