Title |
Fibroblasts as a practical alternative to mesenchymal stem cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12967-018-1536-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas E. Ichim, Pete O’Heeron, Santosh Kesari |
Abstract |
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy offers great potential for treatment of disease through the multifunctional and responsive ability of these cells. In numerous contexts, MSC have been shown to reduce inflammation, modulate immune responses, and provide trophic factor support for regeneration. While the most commonly used MSC source, the bone marrow provides relatively little starting material for cellular expansion, and requires invasive extraction means, fibroblasts are easily harvested in large numbers from various biological wastes. Additionally, in vitro expansion of fibroblasts is significantly easier given the robustness of these cells in tissue culture and shorter doubling time compared to typical MSC. In this paper we put forward the concept that in some cases, fibroblasts may be utilized as a more practical, and potentially more effective cell therapy than mesenchymal stem cells. Anti-inflammatory, immune modulatory, and regenerative properties of fibroblasts will be discussed in the context of regenerative medicine. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 12% |
Unknown | 56 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
Engineering | 11 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 12% |
Unknown | 68 | 38% |