↓ Skip to main content

A mixed methods feasibility study of nicotine-assisted smoking reduction programmes delivered by community pharmacists – The RedPharm study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A mixed methods feasibility study of nicotine-assisted smoking reduction programmes delivered by community pharmacists – The RedPharm study
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4116-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Farley, Sarah Tearne, Taina Taskila, Rachel H. Williams, Susan MacAskill, Jean-Francois Etter, Paul Aveyard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Unspecified 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Unspecified 5 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Psychology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Other 6 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,587,257
of 13,297,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,864
of 9,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,383
of 268,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,297,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.