↓ Skip to main content

High prevalence of hyperglycaemia and the impact of high household income in transforming Rural China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High prevalence of hyperglycaemia and the impact of high household income in transforming Rural China
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-862
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaowei Fu, Yue Chen, Fadi Wang, Xuecai Wang, Jiangen Song, Qingwu Jiang

Abstract

The prevalence of hyperglycaemia and its association with socioeconomic factors have been well studied in developed countries, however, little is known about them in transforming rural China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 19 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 18 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2011.
All research outputs
#17,651,093
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,344
of 14,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,320
of 141,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#168
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.