↓ Skip to main content

Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
394 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
Published in
Nature Climate Change, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x
Authors

Tomoko Hasegawa, Shinichiro Fujimori, Petr Havlík, Hugo Valin, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Jonathan C. Doelman, Thomas Fellmann, Page Kyle, Jason F. L. Koopman, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Yuki Ochi, Ignacio Pérez Domínguez, Elke Stehfest, Timothy B. Sulser, Andrzej Tabeau, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Jun’ya Takakura, Hans van Meijl, Willem-Jan van Zeist, Keith Wiebe, Peter Witzke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 394 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Student > Master 35 13%
Other 21 8%
Professor 17 6%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 10%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 7%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 77 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 530. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#19,275
of 15,380,678 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#109
of 3,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#745
of 277,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#5
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,380,678 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.