↓ Skip to main content

Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
419 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
463 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
Published in
Nature Climate Change, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x
Authors

Tomoko Hasegawa, Shinichiro Fujimori, Petr Havlík, Hugo Valin, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Jonathan C. Doelman, Thomas Fellmann, Page Kyle, Jason F. L. Koopman, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Yuki Ochi, Ignacio Pérez Domínguez, Elke Stehfest, Timothy B. Sulser, Andrzej Tabeau, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Jun’ya Takakura, Hans van Meijl, Willem-Jan van Zeist, Keith Wiebe, Peter Witzke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 419 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 463 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 93 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 16%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 80 17%
Unknown 104 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 82 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 7%
Social Sciences 31 7%
Other 84 18%
Unknown 145 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#30,604
of 21,174,193 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#162
of 3,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#783
of 298,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#6
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,174,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 117.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.