↓ Skip to main content

Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
412 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
Published in
Nature Climate Change, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x
Authors

Tomoko Hasegawa, Shinichiro Fujimori, Petr Havlík, Hugo Valin, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Jonathan C. Doelman, Thomas Fellmann, Page Kyle, Jason F. L. Koopman, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Yuki Ochi, Ignacio Pérez Domínguez, Elke Stehfest, Timothy B. Sulser, Andrzej Tabeau, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Jun’ya Takakura, Hans van Meijl, Willem-Jan van Zeist, Keith Wiebe, Peter Witzke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 412 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 23 13%
Other 15 8%
Professor 14 8%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 37 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 9%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 8%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 54 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 543. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,885
of 14,031,029 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#91
of 2,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#686
of 274,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#4
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,031,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 88.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.