↓ Skip to main content

Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
415 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
Published in
Nature Climate Change, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x
Authors

Tomoko Hasegawa, Shinichiro Fujimori, Petr Havlík, Hugo Valin, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Jonathan C. Doelman, Thomas Fellmann, Page Kyle, Jason F. L. Koopman, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Yuki Ochi, Ignacio Pérez Domínguez, Elke Stehfest, Timothy B. Sulser, Andrzej Tabeau, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Jun’ya Takakura, Hans van Meijl, Willem-Jan van Zeist, Keith Wiebe, Peter Witzke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 415 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Student > Master 24 11%
Other 17 8%
Professor 17 8%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 9%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 8%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 54 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 543. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,328
of 14,173,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#94
of 2,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#690
of 274,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#4
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,173,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 90.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.