↓ Skip to main content

Detections of current-use pesticides at 12 surface water sites in California during a 2-year period beginning in 2015

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detections of current-use pesticides at 12 surface water sites in California during a 2-year period beginning in 2015
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/ds1088
Authors

Sanders, Corey J., Orlando, James L. , Hladik, Michelle L.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,481,678
of 12,471,096 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#634
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,703
of 270,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#39
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,471,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.