↓ Skip to main content

Attitudes of medical students to medical leadership and management: a systematic review to inform curriculum development

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attitudes of medical students to medical leadership and management: a systematic review to inform curriculum development
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark R Abbas, Thelma A Quince, Diana F Wood, John A Benson

Abstract

There is a growing acknowledgement that doctors need to develop leadership and management competences to become more actively involved in the planning, delivery and transformation of patient services. We undertook a systematic review of what is known concerning the knowledge, skills and attitudes of medical students regarding leadership and management. Here we report the results pertaining to the attitudes of students to provide evidence to inform curriculum development in this developing field of medical education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 266 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 84 31%
Unknown 61 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 43%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 66 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2012.
All research outputs
#2,402,159
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#360
of 3,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,196
of 145,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.