↓ Skip to main content

Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields

Overview of attention for article published in Political Analysis, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 561)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
543 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
395 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields
Published in
Political Analysis, July 2018
DOI 10.1017/pan.2018.12
Authors

Michelle L. Dion, Jane Lawrence Sumner, Sara McLaughlin Mitchell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 543 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 257 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Master 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 78 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 59 23%
Engineering 14 5%
Psychology 13 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Other 61 24%
Unknown 87 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 446. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#63,716
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Political Analysis
#1
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,252
of 341,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Analysis
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.