↓ Skip to main content

North China Plain threatened by deadly heatwaves due to climate change and irrigation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
65 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
304 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
North China Plain threatened by deadly heatwaves due to climate change and irrigation
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05252-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suchul Kang, Elfatih A. B. Eltahir

Abstract

North China Plain is the heartland of modern China. This fertile plain has experienced vast expansion of irrigated agriculture which cools surface temperature and moistens surface air, but boosts integrated measures of temperature and humidity, and hence enhances intensity of heatwaves. Here, we project based on an ensemble of high-resolution regional climate model simulations that climate change would add significantly to the anthropogenic effects of irrigation, increasing the risk from heatwaves in this region. Under the business-as-usual scenario of greenhouse gas emissions, North China Plain is likely to experience deadly heatwaves with wet-bulb temperature exceeding the threshold defining what Chinese farmers may tolerate while working outdoors. China is currently the largest contributor to the emissions of greenhouse gases, with potentially serious implications to its own population: continuation of the current pattern of global emissions may limit habitability in the most populous region, of the most populous country on Earth.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 304 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Student > Master 10 7%
Professor 8 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 21%
Environmental Science 25 17%
Engineering 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 42 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 790. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,492
of 14,377,309 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#135
of 26,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347
of 274,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,377,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them