↓ Skip to main content

Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000270.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren Malone, Sarah Marriott, Giles Newton-Howes, Shaeda Simmonds, Peter Tyrer, Malone D, Newron-Howes G, Simmonds S, Marriot S, Tyrer P

Abstract

Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings, underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Psychology 5 26%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,868,569
of 8,511,704 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,104
of 8,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,657
of 82,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,511,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.