↓ Skip to main content

Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000270.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren Malone, Sarah V L Marriott, Giles Newton-Howes, Shaeda Simmonds, Peter Tyrer

Abstract

Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings, underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 33%
Psychology 32 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 29 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,685,914
of 14,715,076 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,467
of 11,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,856
of 89,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,715,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.