↓ Skip to main content

Effects of explicit and implicit self-esteem on in-group favoritism

Overview of attention for article published in THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of explicit and implicit self-esteem on in-group favoritism
Published in
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2007
DOI 10.2130/jjesp.47.69
Authors

Masayuki Harashima, Takashi Oguchi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#73
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,043
of 168,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.