↓ Skip to main content

Aspectos psicológicos da síndrome da fibromialgia juvenil: revisão de literatura

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspectos psicológicos da síndrome da fibromialgia juvenil: revisão de literatura
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.rbr.2015.07.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rubens Goulart, Cinthia Pessoa, Império Lombardi Junior

Abstract

Juvenile fibromyalgia syndrome (JFMS) is a non-inflammatory chronic pain condition that occurs mainly in girls aged nine to 15 years. JFMS is characterized by constant widespread pain in different parts of the body, poor sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and an altered mood. Concomitant psychological and organic factors result in a diminished capacity to cope with pain. The quality of life of individuals with chronic pain and their caregivers is severely restricted and the occurrence of symptoms of anxiety and depression is common in this population. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on psychosocial factors related to JFMS. The findings reveal differences in opinion between patients and family members regarding the effect of the condition, as mothers tend to classify JFMS as more severe than the patients themselves. Individuals with JFMS seem to share the same personality traits and there seems to be a type of family environment that is favorable to the occurrence of this condition. Psychological and functional aspects should be treated with methods that can help patients and family members alter their coping strategies regarding day-to-day problems, attenuate the dysfunctional consequences of pain and fatigue and diminish the risk of catastrophizing that individuals submitted to constant pain develop in relation to their surrounding environment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Psychology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,131,042
of 14,137,193 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#68
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,830
of 252,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,137,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.