↓ Skip to main content

Use of terrestrial field studies in the derivation of bioaccumulation potential of chemicals

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of terrestrial field studies in the derivation of bioaccumulation potential of chemicals
Published in
Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/ieam.1717
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nico W van den Brink, Jennifer A Arblaster, Sarah R Bowman, Jason M Conder, John E Elliott, Mark S Johnson, Derek C G Muir, Tiago Natal-da-Luz, Barnett A Rattner, Bradley E Sample, Richard F Shore

Abstract

Field-based studies are an essential component of research addressing the behavior of organic chemicals, and a unique line of evidence that can be used to assess bioaccumulation potential in chemical registration programs and aid in development of associated laboratory and modeling efforts. To aid scientific and regulatory discourse on the application of terrestrial field data in this manner, this paper provides practical recommendations regarding the generation and interpretation of terrestrial field data. Currently, Biota-to-Soil-Accumulation Factors (BSAFs), Biomagnification Factors (BMFs), and Bioaccumulation Factors (BAFs) are the most suitable bioaccumulation metrics that are applicable to bioaccumulation assessment evaluations and able to be generated from terrestrial field studies with relatively low uncertainty. BMFs calculated from field-collected samples of terrestrial carnivores and their prey appear to be particularly robust indicators of bioaccumulation potential. The use of stable isotope ratios for quantification of trophic relationships in terrestrial ecosystems needs to be further developed to resolve uncertainties associated with the calculation of terrestrial Trophic Magnification Factors (TMFs). Sampling efforts for terrestrial field studies should strive for efficiency, and advice on optimization of study sample sizes, practical considerations for obtaining samples, selection of tissues for analysis, and data interpretation is provided. Although there is still much to be learned regarding terrestrial bioaccumulation, these recommendations provide some initial guidance to the present application of terrestrial field data as a line of evidence in the assessment of chemical bioaccumulation potential and a resource to inform laboratory and modelling efforts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Chemistry 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 25 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,564,883
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#85
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,551
of 395,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.