↓ Skip to main content

What relatives of older medical patients want us to know - a mixed-methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nursing, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What relatives of older medical patients want us to know - a mixed-methods study
Published in
BMC Nursing, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12912-018-0304-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ditte Maria Sivertsen, Louise Lawson-Smith, Tove Lindhardt

Abstract

Relatives of acutely hospitalised older medical patients often act as case managers during a hospital trajectory. Therefore, relatives' experiences of collaboration with staff and their involvement in care and treatment are highly important. However, it is a field facing many challenges. Greater knowledge of the values and areas that are most important to relatives is needed to facilitate the health care staff to better understand and prepare themselves for collaboration with relatives and to guide family care. The aims were to 1) describe the aspects of collaboration with staff during the hospital care trajectory emphasised by relatives of older medical patients 2) compare the characteristics of relatives who wrote free-text notes and those who did not. Relatives of acutely hospitalised older medical patients responded to a structured questionnaire (n = 180), and nearly half wrote free-text comments (n = 79). Free text was analysed with qualitative content analysis. Differences between (+) free text/ (-) free text groups were analysed with χ2 test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Analysis disclosed three categories I) The evasive white flock, concerning the experienced evasiveness in staff attitudes and availability, II) The absence of care as perceived by the relatives and III) Invisible & unrecognised describing relatives' experience of staff's lack of communication, involvement and interactions with relatives especially regarding discharge.Significant differences were found between relatives who wrote free-text and those who did not regarding satisfaction, trust and having a health care education. This study provides knowledge of aspects relatives of older medical patients find particularly problematic and, further, of characteristics of relatives using the free-text field. Overall, these relatives were met with evasiveness from staff, an absence of care and felt invisible and unrecognised in the lacking collaboration with staff. Hence, strategies to ensure quality care and systematic involvement of relatives are needed, and the findings in this study may contribute to, and guide, quality improvement of family centered care in acute hospital wards.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 31%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,888,005
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#529
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,220
of 335,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.