You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004538.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole ABM Ketelaar, Marjan J Faber, Signe Flottorp, Liv Helen Rygh, Katherine HO Deane, Martin P Eccles |
| Abstract |
It is becoming increasingly common to release information about the performance of hospitals, health professionals or providers, and healthcare organisations into the public domain. However, we do not know how this information is used and to what extent such reporting leads to quality improvement by changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, providers and purchasers, or to what extent the performance of professionals and providers can be affected. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 20% |
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 23% |
| Unknown | 28 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,102,258
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,264
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,732
of 155,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.