↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome‐ an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
815 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome‐ an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009416.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil E O'Connell, Benedict M Wand, James H McAuley, Louise Marston, G L Moseley

Abstract

There is currently no strong consensus regarding the optimal management of complex regional pain syndrome although a multitude of interventions have been described and are commonly used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 815 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 805 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 148 18%
Student > Bachelor 116 14%
Researcher 65 8%
Other 63 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 7%
Other 171 21%
Unknown 195 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 279 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 137 17%
Psychology 38 5%
Neuroscience 28 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 3%
Other 85 10%
Unknown 223 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#438,938
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#771
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,966
of 204,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.