↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009416.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil E O'Connell, Benedict M Wand, James McAuley, Louise Marston, G Lorimer Moseley

Abstract

There is currently no strong consensus regarding the optimal management of complex regional pain syndrome although a multitude of interventions have been described and are commonly used.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 401 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 23%
Student > Bachelor 57 14%
Other 44 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 10%
Other 136 33%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 18%
Unspecified 39 9%
Psychology 23 6%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#208,887
of 12,471,096 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#508
of 8,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,155
of 213,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,471,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.