↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
604 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009416.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil E O'Connell, Benedict M Wand, James H McAuley, Louise Marston, G L Moseley

Abstract

There is currently no strong consensus regarding the optimal management of complex regional pain syndrome although a multitude of interventions have been described and are commonly used.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 587 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 132 22%
Student > Bachelor 94 16%
Other 57 9%
Student > Postgraduate 55 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 9%
Other 156 26%
Unknown 55 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 266 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 119 20%
Psychology 32 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Neuroscience 21 3%
Other 67 11%
Unknown 77 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#233,282
of 15,404,980 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#507
of 11,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,750
of 214,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,404,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.