The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||40||74%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||5||9%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||5||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||5%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,960,237 outputs
Outputs from EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing
of 886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 341,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,960,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.