↓ Skip to main content

Does self-monitoring and self-management of blood pressure after stroke or transient ischemic attack improve control? TEST-BP, a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in American Heart Journal, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Does self-monitoring and self-management of blood pressure after stroke or transient ischemic attack improve control? TEST-BP, a randomized controlled trial
Published in
American Heart Journal, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J. Davison, Phyo K. Myint, Allan B. Clark, Lois G. Kim, Edward C. Wilson, Maggie Langley, John F. Potter

Abstract

The therapeutic benefit of self-monitoring blood pressure in stroke patients is uncertain. We investigated the effect of self-monitoring with or without guided antihypertensive management compared with usual care in patients with a recent cerebrovascular event. No between-group differences in blood pressure at outcome were found, but blood pressure self-monitoring and management was well tolerated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 33%
Unspecified 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Unspecified 2 22%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,950,140
of 13,657,732 outputs
Outputs from American Heart Journal
#2,924
of 3,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,648
of 268,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Heart Journal
#38
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,657,732 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.