↓ Skip to main content

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003130.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie N Hofstede, Klaas Auke Nouta, Wilco Jacobs, Miranda L van Hooff, Ate B Wymenga, Bart G Pijls, Rob GHH Nelissen, Perla J Marang‐van de Mheen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Other 19 6%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 76 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Psychology 15 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Unspecified 10 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 92 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,733
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,737
of 362,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.