↓ Skip to main content

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003130.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie N Hofstede, Klaas Auke Nouta, Wilco Jacobs, Miranda L van Hooff, Ate B Wymenga, Bart G Pijls, Rob GHH Nelissen, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 194 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Psychology 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 43 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,957,958
of 13,325,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,022
of 10,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,916
of 268,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,325,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.