| Title |
Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2015.13134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa M. Abegglen, Aleah F. Caulin, Ashley Chan, Kristy Lee, Rosann Robinson, Michael S. Campbell, Wendy K. Kiso, Dennis L. Schmitt, Peter J. Waddell, Srividya Bhaskara, Shane T. Jensen, Carlo C. Maley, Joshua D. Schiffman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 986 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 213 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 60 | 6% |
| Spain | 39 | 4% |
| Thailand | 32 | 3% |
| Canada | 21 | 2% |
| Japan | 21 | 2% |
| Mexico | 20 | 2% |
| France | 14 | 1% |
| India | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 117 | 12% |
| Unknown | 439 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 701 | 71% |
| Scientists | 176 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 93 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 582 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 99 | 16% |
| Researcher | 92 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 107 | 18% |
| Unknown | 116 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 163 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 146 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 70 | 12% |
| Unknown | 140 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1849. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,432
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#165
of 36,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34
of 297,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.