You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modes of fossil preservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology, August 1975
|
DOI | 10.1016/0034-6667(75)90005-6 |
Authors |
James M. Schopf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 19% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology
#174
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#411
of 4,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them