↓ Skip to main content

Modes of fossil preservation

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology, August 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
230 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modes of fossil preservation
Published in
Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology, August 1975
DOI 10.1016/0034-6667(75)90005-6
Authors

James M. Schopf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 19%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology
#174
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#411
of 4,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them