↓ Skip to main content

Attachment histories and futures: reply to Vicedo’s ‘Putting attachment in its place’

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Developmental Psychology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Attachment histories and futures: reply to Vicedo’s ‘Putting attachment in its place’
Published in
European Journal of Developmental Psychology, August 2018
DOI 10.1080/17405629.2018.1502916
Authors

Robbie Duschinsky, Marinus Van Ijzendoorn, Sarah Foster, Sophie Reijman, Francesca Lionetti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 100%
Lecturer 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 75%
Social Sciences 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,739,827
of 13,366,062 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Developmental Psychology
#114
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,682
of 268,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Developmental Psychology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,366,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.