↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Approach to the Therapy of Asthma-COPD Overlap

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Approach to the Therapy of Asthma-COPD Overlap
Published in
CHEST, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2018.07.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego J Maselli, Megan Hardin, Stephanie A Christenson, Nicola A Hanania, Craig P Hersh, Sandra G Adams, Antonio Anzueto, Jay I Peters, MeiLan K Han, Fernando J Martinez

Abstract

Over the past few years there has been a renewed interest in patients with characteristics of both asthma and COPD. Although the precise definition of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) is still controversial, patients with overlapping features are frequently encountered in clinical practice, and may indeed have worse clinical outcomes and increased healthcare utilization than those with asthma or COPD. Therefore, there is a critical need to set a framework for the therapeutic approach of such patients. There are key distinctions in the therapy between asthma and COPD, particularly with regards to the initial choice of therapy. However, there is considerable overlap in the use of existing medications for both diseases. Furthermore, novel therapies approved for asthma, such as monoclonal antibodies, may have a role in patients with COPD and ACO. The use of biomarkers, such as peripheral blood eosinophils, exhaled nitric oxide and serum immunoglobulin E, may help in selecting appropriate therapies for ACO. In this review, we provide an overview of available treatments for both asthma and COPD, and explore their potential role in the treatment of patients with ACO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 16%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 43 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,053,815
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#819
of 13,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,295
of 341,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#10
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.