↓ Skip to main content

Waves of endemic foot-and-mouth disease in eastern Africa suggest feasibility of proactive vaccination approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
67 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Waves of endemic foot-and-mouth disease in eastern Africa suggest feasibility of proactive vaccination approaches
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0636-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Casey-Bryars, Richard Reeve, Umesh Bastola, Nick J. Knowles, Harriet Auty, Katarzyna Bachanek-Bankowska, Veronica L. Fowler, Robert Fyumagwa, Rudovick Kazwala, Tito Kibona, Alasdair King, Donald P. King, Felix Lankester, Anna B. Ludi, Ahmed Lugelo, Francois F. Maree, Deogratius Mshanga, Gloria Ndhlovu, Krupali Parekh, David J. Paton, Brian Perry, Jemma Wadsworth, Satya Parida, Daniel T. Haydon, Thomas L. Marsh, Sarah Cleaveland, Tiziana Lembo

Abstract

Livestock production in Africa is key to national economies, food security and rural livelihoods, and > 85% of livestock keepers live in extreme poverty. With poverty elimination central to the Sustainable Development Goals, livestock keepers are therefore critically important. Foot-and-mouth disease is a highly contagious livestock disease widespread in Africa that contributes to this poverty. Despite its US$2.3 billion impact, control of the disease is not prioritized: standard vaccination regimens are too costly, its impact on the poorest is underestimated, and its epidemiology is too weakly understood. Our integrated analysis in Tanzania shows that the disease is of high concern, reduces household budgets for human health, and has major impacts on milk production and draft power for crop production. Critically, foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in cattle are driven by livestock-related factors with a pattern of changing serotype dominance over time. Contrary to findings in southern Africa, we find no evidence of frequent infection from wildlife, with outbreaks in cattle sweeping slowly across the region through a sequence of dominant serotypes. This regularity suggests that timely identification of the epidemic serotype could allow proactive vaccination ahead of the wave of infection, mitigating impacts, and our preliminary matching work has identified potential vaccine candidates. This strategy is more realistic than wildlife-livestock separation or conventional foot-and-mouth disease vaccination approaches. Overall, we provide strong evidence for the feasibility of coordinated foot-and-mouth disease control as part of livestock development policies in eastern Africa, and our integrated socioeconomic, epidemiological, laboratory and modelling approach provides a framework for the study of other disease systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 24%
Researcher 29 24%
Student > Master 13 11%
Professor 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#400,753
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#744
of 2,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,567
of 340,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#36
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.