You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of “Jelly” CdTe QD uptake on RAW264.7 monocytes: immune responses and cell fate study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Toxicology Research, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c5tx00153f |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
O. Gladkovskaya, A. Loudon, M. Nosov, Y. K. Gun'ko, G. M. O'Connor, Y. Rochev |
| Abstract |
Encapsulation of Quantum Dots (QDs) has become an essential factor which regulates particles cytotoxicity, as well as physical and chemical stability. Negatively charged cellular membranes have a great affinity to nanoparticles with surface molecules carrying positive charge, hence creating perfect conditions for fast and aggressive intracellular penetration. The preference for non-charged outer shells is topical in QD design and various applications. In the current paper we develop gelatination as a prominent coating approach to create neutrally passivated QDs with improved biocompatibility. We have revealed the trends in particle's uptake, accumulation, intracellular localisation and retaining time as well as RAW264.7 monocyte cell fate and immune responses. Also the difference in particle endocytosis kinetics and dynamics has been shown to depend on the QD core size. The intracellular QD content along with cell responses at the population level was quantified by flow cytometry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,848,613
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Toxicology Research
#479
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,936
of 295,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicology Research
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.