Title |
A scoping review of definitions and frameworks of intersectoral action
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/1413-812320152010.01222014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alejandra Dubois, Louise St-Pierre, Mirella Veras |
Abstract |
Intersectoral action is rooted in all health promotion activities because the determinants of health lie outside of the health sector. Despite the increasing use of these terms (intersectoral action, intersectoral action for health, intersectoral collaboration), often interchangeably, we noted a lack of consensus on their definitions and conceptualizations. The objective of this paper is to report the results of a scoping review of the use of definitions for a set of related terms as well as for conceptual frameworks, including the discussion of the evolution of those definitions and the sectors that use them. Finally, we propose a single definition for each term. We conducted a systematic search for documents published between January, 1960 and March, 2011 in English, French, Spanish and Portuguese. We retrieved 11 to 15 definitions per main term. Using a content analysis approach, an integrative conceptual definition was proposed for four main terms. Furthermore, in reviewing frameworks for potential use, we noted the lack of a comprehensive framework for intersectoral processes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 9 | 39% |
Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 20 | 27% |