↓ Skip to main content

Neonicotinoid pesticides severely affect honey bee queens

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neonicotinoid pesticides severely affect honey bee queens
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep14621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey R. Williams, Aline Troxler, Gina Retschnig, Kaspar Roth, Orlando Yañez, Dave Shutler, Peter Neumann, Laurent Gauthier

Abstract

Queen health is crucial to colony survival of social bees. Recently, queen failure has been proposed to be a major driver of managed honey bee colony losses, yet few data exist concerning effects of environmental stressors on queens. Here we demonstrate for the first time that exposure to field-realistic concentrations of neonicotinoid pesticides during development can severely affect queens of western honey bees (Apis mellifera). In pesticide-exposed queens, reproductive anatomy (ovaries) and physiology (spermathecal-stored sperm quality and quantity), rather than flight behaviour, were compromised and likely corresponded to reduced queen success (alive and producing worker offspring). This study highlights the detriments of neonicotinoids to queens of environmentally and economically important social bees, and further strengthens the need for stringent risk assessments to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem services that are vulnerable to these substances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 388 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 15%
Student > Master 56 14%
Researcher 51 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 78 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 181 45%
Environmental Science 42 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 7%
Chemistry 8 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Other 41 10%
Unknown 94 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#152,213
of 24,052,577 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,813
of 130,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,021
of 283,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#30
of 2,492 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,052,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,492 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.