↓ Skip to main content

Do individual differences in behavior influence wild rodents more than predation risk?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammalogy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do individual differences in behavior influence wild rodents more than predation risk?
Published in
Journal of Mammalogy, September 2015
DOI 10.1093/jmammal/gyv142
Authors

Teigan Cremona, Valentina S. A. Mella, Jonathan K. Webb, Mathew S. Crowther

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 69%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#10,239,693
of 18,687,462 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#2,108
of 2,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,914
of 262,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,687,462 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.