You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social prescribing service: a mixed method analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3437-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Woodall, Joanne Trigwell, Ann-Marie Bunyan, Gary Raine, Victoria Eaton, Joanne Davis, Lucy Hancock, Mary Cunningham, Sue Wilkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 57% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Psychology | 21 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,603,162
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#520
of 8,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,395
of 344,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#22
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.