You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How are legal matters related to the access of traditional knowledge being considered in the scope of ethnobotany publications in Brazil?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Botanica Brasilica, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-33062014abb0007 |
| Authors |
Heitor Suriano Nascimento Liporacci, Tatiana Mota Miranda, Natalia Hanazaki, Nivaldo Peroni |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#229
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,177
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.