↓ Skip to main content

The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,121)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
151 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0064-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Caulfield, Ubaka Ogbogu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 176 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 45 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 26 14%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 47 26%
Unknown 57 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#328,440
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#9
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,514
of 293,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.